<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back in the Swing of Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/</link>
	<description>Michael S. Roth became Wesleyan University's 16th president on July 1, 2007.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Pesci</title>
		<link>http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/#comment-6063</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pesci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/#comment-6063</guid>
		<description>I saw Saul Carlin's post contrasting Wesleyan's online posting policy with that of Yale. While well intentioned, Mr. Carlin's assertion that Yale's policy is more "progressive yet prudent" in incorrect. Here is Yale's policy:

http://www.yale.edu/ppdev/policy/1607/1607.pdf

If examined with regards to electronic posting and non-profit status, this policy is virtually identical in letter and intent to Wesleyan's policy. Specifically, look Section C, items 2 &#38; 3 which state:
"2. Use that is inconsistent with Yale's non-profit status. The University is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization and, as such, is subject to specific federal, state, and local laws regarding sources of income, political activities, use of property, and similar matters. As a result, commercial use of IT Systems for non-Yale purposes is generally prohibited, except if specifically authorized and permitted under University conflict-of-interest, outside employment, and other related policies. Prohibited commercial use does not include communications and exchange of data that furthers the University's educational, administrative, research, clinical, and other roles, regardless of whether it has an incidental financial or other benefit to an external organization. 
3. Use of IT Systems in a way that suggests University endorsement of any political candidate or ballot initiative is also prohibited. Users must refrain from using IT Systems for the purpose of lobbying that 
connotes University involvement, except for authorized lobbying through or in consultation with the University's General Counsel's Office." (source, Yale University)  

This is identical to the policy Wesleyan follows when posting items.

David Pesci
Director of Media Relations, Wesleyan University</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Saul Carlin&#8217;s post contrasting Wesleyan&#8217;s online posting policy with that of Yale. While well intentioned, Mr. Carlin&#8217;s assertion that Yale&#8217;s policy is more &#8220;progressive yet prudent&#8221; in incorrect. Here is Yale&#8217;s policy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yale.edu/ppdev/policy/1607/1607.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.yale.edu/ppdev/policy/1607/1607.pdf</a></p>
<p>If examined with regards to electronic posting and non-profit status, this policy is virtually identical in letter and intent to Wesleyan&#8217;s policy. Specifically, look Section C, items 2 &amp; 3 which state:<br />
&#8220;2. Use that is inconsistent with Yale&#8217;s non-profit status. The University is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization and, as such, is subject to specific federal, state, and local laws regarding sources of income, political activities, use of property, and similar matters. As a result, commercial use of IT Systems for non-Yale purposes is generally prohibited, except if specifically authorized and permitted under University conflict-of-interest, outside employment, and other related policies. Prohibited commercial use does not include communications and exchange of data that furthers the University&#8217;s educational, administrative, research, clinical, and other roles, regardless of whether it has an incidental financial or other benefit to an external organization.<br />
3. Use of IT Systems in a way that suggests University endorsement of any political candidate or ballot initiative is also prohibited. Users must refrain from using IT Systems for the purpose of lobbying that<br />
connotes University involvement, except for authorized lobbying through or in consultation with the University&#8217;s General Counsel&#8217;s Office.&#8221; (source, Yale University)  </p>
<p>This is identical to the policy Wesleyan follows when posting items.</p>
<p>David Pesci<br />
Director of Media Relations, Wesleyan University</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lewis</title>
		<link>http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/#comment-5895</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/#comment-5895</guid>
		<description>President Roth,

I think this is why a forum like your blog works well because you get to have a discourse on issues like whether Prof. Pryce's article should be posted, chalkings, etc.

And I would note that Yale, our peer institution, has a nice cushion in their endowment (multi-billion dollar cushion I might add) for an IRS fight if they are challenged. (note for Mr. Carlin)

I think I would rather that money go toward the new Science building or creating a campus that even better prepares leaders to champion progressive causes vs. fighting for tax exempt status based on a link.

Just my two cents....
Michael Lewis '03</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Roth,</p>
<p>I think this is why a forum like your blog works well because you get to have a discourse on issues like whether Prof. Pryce&#8217;s article should be posted, chalkings, etc.</p>
<p>And I would note that Yale, our peer institution, has a nice cushion in their endowment (multi-billion dollar cushion I might add) for an IRS fight if they are challenged. (note for Mr. Carlin)</p>
<p>I think I would rather that money go toward the new Science building or creating a campus that even better prepares leaders to champion progressive causes vs. fighting for tax exempt status based on a link.</p>
<p>Just my two cents&#8230;.<br />
Michael Lewis &#8216;03</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Carlin '09</title>
		<link>http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Carlin '09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roth.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2008/03/25/back-in-the-swing-of-things/#comment-5894</guid>
		<description>Wesleyan's remarkably conservative approach its 501(c)3 tax status is strikingly inconsistent with our institutional values of participation and engagement.  With years of overly risk-averse policy towards the Wesleyan community's attempts to take part in the national conversation, it's no wonder that our peers have surpassed us in this regard.

Not that I would advocate further emulating an Ivy, but Yale has a progressive yet prudent approach to pushing the limits of its 501(c)3 tax status, which deserves your investigation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wesleyan&#8217;s remarkably conservative approach its 501(c)3 tax status is strikingly inconsistent with our institutional values of participation and engagement.  With years of overly risk-averse policy towards the Wesleyan community&#8217;s attempts to take part in the national conversation, it&#8217;s no wonder that our peers have surpassed us in this regard.</p>
<p>Not that I would advocate further emulating an Ivy, but Yale has a progressive yet prudent approach to pushing the limits of its 501(c)3 tax status, which deserves your investigation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
