October 1 Boston Globe Article

UPDATE

This afternoon (Monday), I sent the following note to the campus:

I’ve been reading comments, blogs, and listening to students who are reacting to the news concerning Scott Backer, former Associate Dean of Students. I realize that in the blog post I wrote yesterday upon returning to campus, I neglected to say the most important thing: I am sorry. I apologize that the university hired someone who had been fired for grossly inappropriate behavior and put him in a position of responsibility for dealing with survivors of sexual assault. The university did not know his past, but we needed to know. We failed at that, and I apologize for the pain this has caused members of our community. 

I know conversations will continue about this subject in the days and weeks to come. Student Affairs, CAPS, and the Office of Equity and Inclusion all have resources available.

We can and will do better.

 ————————

This weekend the Boston Globe ran a story in a series concerning the ways some private high schools have dealt with sexual misconduct issues. This morning’s story detailed how these schools allow employees found responsible for infractions to leave without a record of their misdeeds. Through the Globe’s investigation, Wesleyan learned that Scott Backer, then Associate Dean of Students here, had been terminated at Vermont Academy for clearly inappropriate behavior. As Dean Mike Whaley described in a campus email today, the high school’s officials provided glowing recommendations for Mr. Backer – they concealed that he was terminated and the reasons for the termination.

Many are asking why Wesleyan didn’t know about his misconduct when Mr. Backer was hired back in 2007. Upon learning of the Globe‘s investigation, I initiated a review of the hiring process; the background check performed at the time didn’t turn up anything relevant. We have long since strengthened those checks. Of course, no check at the time would have turned up a yet-to-be filed civil lawsuit against Mr. Backer.

Within hours of learning about the circumstances of his termination at Vermont Academy and the efforts to conceal these circumstances, the university fired Mr. Backer. Since as Associate Dean he sat on and often chaired panels dealing with sexual misconduct, we hired an independent firm expert in these matters to review his performance. I should stress, though, that Mr. Backer never had sole authority over cases. He was part of a process involving several people and appropriate balances. Nonetheless, we turned to the law firm Pepper Hamilton, who most consider the best firm in the country for these kinds of issues, to investigate cases with which Mr. Backer was involved. We were very relieved to learn that they found nothing amiss.

Some have asked why we didn’t make all this public ourselves? Although I did inform the leadership of the Board of Trustees and the Cabinet, after much deliberation I decided that it would have been wrong to discuss publicly why we had fired an employee unless there was a compelling reason to do so. If Pepper-Hamilton had found something problematic in Mr. Backer’s work at Wesleyan, that would have been a reason to bring this to the attention of the campus. Unlike Vermont Academy, Wesleyan has created an employment record that includes termination for cause for Mr. Backer. But I do not think it appropriate to publicly discuss a personnel matter, unless that situation was already made public. That has happened today, which leads me to write now.

In an essay on the Obama Administration’s legacy for higher education, I recently wrote that “colleges and universities are responsible for abusive aspects of student culture that prevent women (and members of LGBTQ communities) from having access to the same benefits of higher education as most men do.”

Colleges can no longer turn a blind eye to sexual assault without fear of consequences. As survivors came to realize that they “are not alone,” they forced colleges to take sexual assault seriously as a civil-rights issue. Part of this was just shining a bright light on the problem; for example, requiring the publication of assault statistics. At my own university, there has been a sharp increase in the number of reported sexual assaults. This is a painful, painful process — but a necessary one. Colleges that have few to no reported incidents of sexual assault are today viewed not with admiration, but with justified suspicion.

I am grateful for the Boston Globe’s investigation, but I would be very sorry if the university’s hiring of Scott Backer in 2007 creates suspicion about our efforts to counter the scourge of campus sexual assault. We are training hundreds in bystander intervention, we have cooperative agreements with law enforcement and community-based groups, and with input from students and experts in the field we have refined our procedures to better assist survivors and fairly adjudicate cases.

With help from the entire community, we will continue our efforts to support survivors, educate the community about the issues, and to hold accountable anyone found responsible for violating our policies.

 

3 thoughts on “October 1 Boston Globe Article

  1. “I would be very sorry if the university’s hiring of Scott Backer in 2007 creates suspicion about our efforts to counter the scourge of campus s#xual assault.”

    You are sorry that there is an appearance of impropriety? How very kind of you.

    Examples of better apologies:
    “I am sorry for all of the pain that we have caused you, first by hiring Scott Backer, and second by not announcing our mistake to the community as soon as we learned of it. That was wrong, and it will not happen again”
    OR
    “There is a tragic irony to the fact that someone who s#xually propositioned a fifteen-year-old girl was in charge of investigating S#xual Misconduct at Wesleyan for eight years. This is unacceptable, and we should have alerted the community, especially the survivors whose cases Mr. Backer oversaw, as soon as we found out”
    OR
    Literally anything besides the patting-yourself-on-the-back post that you just published.

    Honestly Professor Roth, this was very disappointing for me to read. I thought you were trying to make Wesleyan a leader in the fight against campus s#xual assault. With all of the recent opinion pieces you’ve written, you clearly think of yourself as such. But actions speak louder than words, and difficult, honest words ring truer than hollow, empty ones.
    I know it can be hard to admit when one has made a mistake, but think of how hard it must be for survivors whose cases were presided over by Scott Backer. Think about their shock and disgust in learning this news, not from their alma mater in a personal email, but along with the rest of the world, in a Boston Globe article. Think about what they need to hear you say right now, and then reconsider your inability to take responsibility and apologize.

    Who knows if this will actually be posted as a public comment, but I certainly hope that you are able to read it and take a good long think.

    With profound disappointment,
    Lisle Winston
    B.A. Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
    Class of 2014

  2. Thank you, Mr. Roth. Both for the updated apology, and the evident care you are taking to address the concerns as they are brought up. More than the corrected language, I am heartened to know that Mr. Backer’s former role in the hearings are being investigated. There are still many complexities in this case that have not been remediated to satisfaction, but your response thus far suggests your doors, though closed, are not locked.

  3. “I decided that it would have been wrong to discuss publicly why we had fired an employee unless there was a compelling reason to do so.”

    I am so, so disappointed in you, Roth. If you don’t consider Scott Backer’s involvement in the same type of misconduct he was supposed to address at Wesleyan to be a compelling reason to share cause for termination, I shudder to think what circumstances would give you a reason compelling enough. You let a wolf be in charge of the henhouse. I know several students who had already complained about Scott Backer to other deans and administrators, only to have their complaints ignored and swept under the rug (a notable example, whom I’m sure would be happy to share her experiences regarding former Dean Backer with you on the record, is Karmenife Gomez-Paulino ’16).
    President Roth, it is clear to me that Wesleyan’s administration must be caught with their pants fully down in the national media spotlight to admit even one iota of fault. You have my hollowest of thanks for your hollowest of apologies. I have the utmost confidence that Wesleyan’s administration will avoid making any meaningful change in regards to its lack of transparency and accountability.
    I write this not in the hopes of changing your position on the opacity of Wesleyan’s administration, which I believe is not going to change no matter what happens. I write this only to let you know that students, at least myself and friends I have discussed this with, are not buying your attempts to sweep the administration’s lack of accountability under the rug.

    Respectfully,
    Joseph Natter
    Class of 2017

Comments are closed.