We Are All Immigrants!

In the face of administrative orders from the White House that deny entry to the United States to citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries, we feel it is important to reaffirm Wesleyan University’s commitment to its students, faculty and staff, regardless of their country of origin or their religious beliefs.

Wesleyan has welcomed and will continue to welcome students to apply for admission and, if accepted, to enroll regardless of their immigration status. Despite threatening language from the White House, we will continue to treat undocumented students, with or without Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), who apply to Wesleyan identically to any other U.S. citizen or permanent resident in their high school. We are appalled by the religious test that is included in this new immigration order, and we reaffirm that there will be no discrimination on the basis of religion on our campus.

Our international programs, our financial aid policies and employment programs comply with all applicable Federal and State laws. However, we will object to and oppose administrative dictates that violate the law and the Constitution and, if necessary, we will work with others to do so in court.

Our Public Safety Officers do not inquire about the immigration status of the members of the Wesleyan community, and they will not do so in the future. Except where we are required to do so by law, we intend to protect our ability to refuse to partner or assist ICE or law enforcement on questions concerning purely immigration status matters. In particular, we are committed to the privacy of all student information, including immigration status.

Since our very beginnings, our country has been immeasurably strengthened by immigrants. Turning our backs on those in need today is worse than heartless. Since the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, discrimination on the basis of national origin has been illegal. The idea of a religious test for immigrants from some parts of the world is reprehensible, and we believe it to be unconstitutional. These are matters that will be resolved in the courts. Meanwhile, Wesleyan University will remain steadfast in our commitment to treat immigrants and refugees with the dignity and respect they deserve. This is what we mean when we say we are a Sanctuary Campus.

Wesleyan is an institution of open-minded inquiry and education, and as such we refuse bigotry and demagoguery. As I’ve written before, “being horrified is not enough.” We must take our revulsion against the politics of fear and scapegoating, and turn it into efforts to create inclusive communities that celebrate diversity while building compassionate solidarity.

Talking Liberal Education in India

Last week I visited India to talk about liberal education and talk with Wesleyan folks. We’ve seen a sharp increase in applications from India, and it was exciting to talk with high school guidance counselors from several international schools in Mumbai as well as to a group of high school students. One was especially excited to meet the president of the school that graduated the creators of Hamilton! We had over 40 people at a reception in Mumbai, a city I was visiting for the first time.

Mumbai
Mumbai

IMG_2854

Wesleyan Reception
Wesleyan Reception

After a couple of days in Mumbai I was off to the literary festival in Jaipur. This is known as the “Woodstock of Books”—a free festival that attracts hundreds of thousands to hear authors, filmmakers and musicians talk about poetry, fiction, and all manner of non-fiction work. My panel was discussing (you guessed it) liberal education, this time in the context of STEM and nation building in the global south. A few thousand people crowded under a beautiful tent to hear us discuss how a broad, contextual education can benefit all students.

IMG_2876
Jaipur audience for Liberal Education Panel
Jaipur Festival
Jaipur Festival
IMG_2872
Hamilton Slide on Right (not my presentation!)

While I was in India, the Times of India talked to me about American higher education. Given it was Inauguration week, they framed this in more political terms. Here’s the article 

MUMBAI: The morning after the world woke up to Donald Trump‘s shock win, student protests and an open denial of 45th President-elect of the United States, the first thing that Michael S Roth, president of the Wesleyan University in Connecticut, did was send out a public message to his students and colleagues. “This election has heightened feelings of alienation and vulnerability. The pain of targeted groups is real, and we must acknowledge it and work to mitigate its effects. But we will be alright because we will continue to strive to build the inclusive community that rejects white supremacy, bigotry and fear…” he wrote.

Roth is not afraid to speak his mind, even as the countdown to the presidential inauguration ticks. What worries him instead is the impending politics of exclusivity that might prove “antithetical to education”, he said on his recent visit to Mumbai. “Over these years, I have seen Presidents from different parties but never spoken out publicly. What Trump was saying on his campaign trail was horrendous—scapegoating Muslims, denigrating scientists, rejecting fact-based inquiry—as educators we have to stand up for the values of inclusion, equity, free speech and the right to do research of a certain kind that may challenge assumptions of people in power,” stressed Roth.

A Princeton scholar who has authored six books, Roth was the second in his family to attend college. “My father was a coat-maker and my mother, a singer. They’d be quite puzzled seeing me study all the time!” An advocate for liberal arts education that combines humanities and basic sciences, Roth emphasized why “pragmatic” liberal education that allows a multiplicity of perspectives matters now more than ever. But in India where specialized education still remains the focus, Roth sees the British system weigh heavy and belie its history of holistic education propagated by the Tagore school. “It’s important to recognize that jobs today need one to think outside their narrow areas. My friends in Stanford, Google and Ideo tell me that they’re looking for more engineers with liberal arts education to find innovative solutions to old problems,” he said, busting the popular “left brain versus right brain” myth.

While liberal arts is yet to be mainstreamed in India, there is a surge in interest among Indians pursuing studies in the US. “In the last two years, Wesleyan has received double the number of applications from India, running into a few hundreds.”

Liberal Education: Now More than Ever

The following is reposted from the Washington Post.

I recently participated in a celebration of the 15th anniversary of the opening of Peking University’s branch campus in the young, dynamic city of Shenzhen. PKU is a venerable institution considered to be at the pinnacle of higher learning in China, and in recent years it has been making great efforts to be recognized as one of the top research universities in the world. I was invited to speak because PKU-Shenzhen has decided to start an undergraduate liberal arts college and I’ve been making the case over the last several years for a pragmatic liberal education. In the conclusion to my 2014 book “Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters,” I expressed my excitement at China’s new interest in liberal learning, and the experience I just had in Shenzhen leads me to think that this interest is surging.

This is a fragile time for liberal education, making commitment to it all the more urgent. American universities are facing enormous pressures to demonstrate the cash value of their “product,” while at the same time the recreational side of college life is attracting more attention than ever – from football games to Greek life, from fancy dorms and fancier gyms to student celebrations that range from the Dionysian to the politically correct. To meet enrollment goals or to climb in the rankings many colleges offer the full spa experience, while being sure to trumpet the values of what young people learn while not in the classroom. But these efforts at brand promotion only make the educational mission of universities more fragile. “Campus follies” have become a staple of critiques of higher education’s elitism and entitlement.

To be sure, college culture has been mocked throughout American history, but today collegiate life inspires either a toxic mixture of anger and resentment or just baffled misunderstanding. Given the coverage of campus life, it’s understandable that the American public seems to have forgotten how important our universities have been as engines of economic and cultural innovation, of social mobility.

As I was preparing my remarks, I turned to the writings of John Dewey, the great pragmatist philosopher. Dewey went to China in 1919 to talk about education, also a time of change. The May 4th movement was creating a dynamic of protest against the excessive weight of tradition in favor of a notion of Enlightenment and modernization that would work within a changing Chinese context. It was a propitious moment for Dewey to advocate for a broad, liberal education to prepare the Chinese to be informed, productive members of society. He initially planned to give several lectures in China but wound up staying two years. Known as Du Wei – Dewey the Great (as John Pomfret recently noted), his influence there was powerful. Mao himself transcribed Dewey’s  lectures in Changsha, though Communists would later become intensely critical of the gradualism embedded in the Dewey’s legacy.

In Shenzhen, with Dewey in mind, I focused on two dangers and two possibilities.

 

Danger of Narrowing Specialization

Academics don’t get stuck in silos by accident; seeking professional status, they are incentivized to burrow deep. They become so accustomed to their own subdisciplinary netherworlds that they have trouble in anyone else’s atmosphere. Department members often see no reason to interact with colleagues from other fields, and so undergraduates have almost no hope of getting guidance about their education as a whole. Despite the commonplace rhetoric of interdisciplinarity, academics seem all too content creating languages and cultures that are insular. We have gotten really good at education as a form of narrowing, while what we really need is to provide students with intellectual cross-training, and for that we need faculty who can communicate across a variety of fields.

Liberal education should enhance abilities to translate across ideas and assumptions, but instead the public is treated to the spectacle of pointy-headed specialists great at one thing but not to be trusted beyond their small subfield. Of course, advanced work in any area requires rigorous work and real technical competence. But we must not confuse being a competent technician with being a scientist who can make discoveries or a teacher who can inspire students by translating complex technical issues into terms clearly relevant to pressing human concerns.

In Shenzhen I urged colleagues not to replicate the two cultures division that infects many American campuses. We need more academics who can facilitate conversations between the sciences and the humanistic disciplines.  The sciences, social sciences and humanities are all focused on research, and sustained artistic practice depends on a commitment to inquiry. It is especially important for undergraduate education to foster exchange among researchers, be they in medicine, philosophy, design, literature or economics.

 

Danger of Populist Parochialism 

Just as on campuses we have gotten all-too-good at isolation through specialization, in the public sphere we know how to stimulate parochialism. New provincialisms and nationalisms, are gaining force around the world thanks to fear-based politics; but orchestrated parochialism is antithetical to liberal learning.  A liberal education includes deepening one’s ability to learn from people with whom one doesn’t agree, but the politics of resentment sweeping across many countries substitutes demonization for curiosity. Writing people off with whom one disagrees will always be easier than listening carefully to their arguments. Without tolerance and open-mindedness, inquiry is just a path to self-congratulation at best, violent scapegoating at worst.

It is especially urgent to advocate effectively for a broadly based pragmatic liberal education when confronted by ignorant authoritarians who reject inquiry in favor of fear mongering and prejudice. A broad education with a sense of history and cultural possibilities arms citizens against manipulation and allows them to see beyond allegiance to their own.

Undergraduate education – be it in China or the United States – should promote intellectual diversity in such ways that students are inspired to grapple with ideas that they never would have considered on their own. At Wesleyan University, creating more access for low-income students and military veterans has been an important part of this process.  Groups like these have been historically under-represented on our campus, but just having diverse groups is not enough. We must also devise programs to make these groups more likely to engage with one another, bursting protective bubbles of ideas that lead some campus radicals and free speech absolutists to have in common mostly a commitment to smug self-righteousness.

 

Possibilities of Open and Reliable Communication

There can be no research progress without the effective sharing of information. In astrophysics and genomic science today, scientists depend on data sets that can be shared. Likewise, humanists depend on reliable, publicly available documents and critical editions. Unlike commercial enterprises that quickly make discoveries proprietary, academic research at its best depends on sharing methods and results. And significant research progress is made when scholars discover evidence and points of view that challenge their own assumptions.

As I admired the PKU Shenzhen campus, I remembered that search engines (like Google) and news sources (like the New York Times) are unavailable there because of government censorship. Still, the scholars I met on campus seemed to have little trouble gaining access to a variety of points of view. Under a regime that officially restricts information, they work hard at expanding the inputs they receive. In the West, we are fortunate to have at our fingertips a dizzying array of information and points of view. But in recent years Americans have increasingly tended to block out views they don’t want to hear. Curating our information inputs, we choose our choir and know what kind of preaching we are going to hear. Algorithms that filter information to each user are not the same as censorship, but they, too, are anathema to inquiry.

Almost a century ago, Dewey reminded his Chinese audiences: “Where material things are concerned, the more people who share them, the less each will have, but the opposite is true of knowledge. The store of knowledge is increased by the number of people who come to share in it. Knowledge can be shared and increased at the same time— in fact, it is increased by being shared.” A university today must be a vehicle for sharing knowledge – and its leaders must advocate for consistently communicating the values of learning, including from surprising sources.

 

Possibilities of cosmopolitanism and community

While lecturing in China, Dewey wrote of the power of education to “cultivate individuality in such ways as will enhance the individual’s social sympathy.” It’s a two-way street. If we are to prepare the soil for the more effective cultivation of pragmatic liberal education, we will need the nutrients of creative individuality, cosmopolitanism and community. Empowering individuals to take productive risks and encouraging them to develop what Dewey called “practical idealism” has long been the hallmark of pragmatic liberal learning. Cosmopolitanism helps us grow a culture of openness and curiosity, recognizing that people are, in Anthony Appiah’s words, “entitled to the options they need to shape their lives in partnership with others.”

Developing a campus community means seeding relations of trust that encourage experimentation and intellectual risk taking. At healthy universities, professors and staff learn to care for the welfare of their students, and students learn to look out for one another. In dynamic educational environments, people are more willing to venture beyond their comfort zones because they have background assumptions of trust. And as they become more adept at intellectual and cultural translation, they deepen this trust while making these zones more porous.

Although there are commendable aspects of the current American focus on skill acquisition in higher education, we must avoid confusing the accumulation of competence badges with what in China is still called “the education of the whole person.” We need an undergraduate education that is human centered – setting a framework for inquiry and exchange that will be a resource for graduates for the rest of their lives.

Almost one hundred years ago Dewey spoke about the dual tasks of the university: to preserve culture and to stimulate inquiry for the sake of social progress. In China, scholars are daring to imagine this progress, despite political tendencies that foster nationalist insularity and limit access to people and information.

Such progress is becoming harder to imagine in America given a looming administration bent on ignoring facts and a leader quick to dismiss inquiries that don’t feed his apparently bottomless need for self-aggrandizement. This is the context in which we must find, as Dewey wrote, “faith in the power of intelligence to imagine a future which is the projection of the desirable in the present, and to invent the instrumentalities of it realization.”  These remain the tasks of thinking, inquiry and communication.

Now, at this fragile time and on both sides of the Pacific, pragmatic liberal education matters more than ever.

Winter Wesleyan

The break between semesters starts to seem long for many students around this time — and also for their families. Others find they are digesting grades and comments from the fall semester while preparing for the term to come. I know many professors who are busy trying to make progress on research projects while also getting their courses ready for the start of classes. I’ve taught “Philosophy and the Movies” for many years, but I’m hitting the stacks in Olin Library this week to check out some new scholarship on the films I teach in relation to history, memory and how to make sense of the past.

Of course, lots of Wesleyan folks have been here on campus the whole time. Some are international students who have decided that a journey home is just too far (and expensive), others are seniors working on theses right through the break. There are a significant number of students taking Winter Session classes starting tomorrow in everything from computer science to government, from applied data analysis to classics. Meanwhile, others are deepening their understanding of how to connect college to what comes next at the Gordon Career Center. Athletes have been working (and competing) pretty much straight through the break, and we see them trudging through the snow to practice or to a match.

Snow? Yes there is now plenty on the campus, and the sledders were out on Foss Hill yesterday. Here are some pics.

Who is walking whom?
Who is walking whom?

 

IMG_2816 IMG_2824 IMG_2831 IMG_2832 IMG_2834

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mathilde enjoying winter break
Mathilde (and Kari) enjoying winter break

 

Liberal Education in China

This week I made a quick trip to Hong Kong and Shenzhen to meet with Wesleyan folks and to give a lecture on liberal education in these challenging times. Peking University was celebrating its 15th anniversary of operating a graduate campus in Shenzhen, a young, innovative city just a couple of hours drive north of Hong Kong. As a way of marking this occasion, PKU officials are developing a liberal arts undergraduate program, and they asked me to talk about Wesleyan and pragmatic liberal education today. I met with a few dozen Wes folks first in Hong Kong, with lots of help from Carmen Cheung ’05.

In Shenzhen I met many researchers and university officials from campuses around the world, but the great thrill was meeting Xinyue, who was just accepted in ED to join the class 0f 2021. She even had Wesleyan gear! I also had the chance to meet the parents of Milia Chen ’20 (and her guidance counselor). That was also a lovely surprise.

Once I get past the jet lag, I’ll write up the Pragmatic Liberal Education in an Age of Populist Parochialism. The title gives some idea of the themes….

Hong Kong Wesleyan Reception
Hong Kong Wesleyan Reception

 

The Maks P'20
The Maks P’20

 

Hong Kong Harbor
Hong Kong Harbor

 

Xinyue '21
Xinyue ’21

 

Chen Parents ('20) and Guidance Counselor
Chen Parents (’20) and Guidance Counselor

 


Looking Forward, Looking Back

Near the end of the fall semester, I’ve usually presented a fairly brief update on what we’ve done over the last year with respect to our framework for planning, Wesleyan 2020This year we are working on an addendum to this framework that will take us out much further than four years from now. We’ve called this Beyond 2020: Strategies for Wesleyan, and over the course of this academic year I am discussing its core ideas with all campus constituencies. In conjunction with this look forward, we have prepared an assessment of our work on the objectives we set out in 2010. There’s quite a bit here, and my thanks go to staff around the campus who collected the information. You can find a PDF of this document HERE.

Over the years we’ve accomplished a great deal together, and yet there is still so much more we can do to realize Wesleyan’s full potential. I remain convinced that the overarching goals in Wesleyan 2020 are useful for framing the work we will do together. Together we energize Wesleyan’s distinctive educational experience; together we enhance recognition of Wesleyan as an extraordinary institution; together we work within a sustainable economic model while retaining core values.  

Fall semester is coming to a close, the next approaches, and in the meantime, the holidays. I wish you satisfaction in accomplishment, excitement about the future, and joy in your holiday celebrations. 

 

Hamilton Prize Committee!

Today we’re announcing an all-star list of Wesleyan alumni to serve as judges for the new Wesleyan University Hamilton Prize for Creativity. Their accomplishments are a testament to Wesleyan’s outsized role as an incubator of some of today’s most boundary-breaking thinkers, artists and writers. I’m so pleased that these extraordinary contributors to our society and culture have generously agreed to volunteer their time to select our first Hamilton Prize recipient, who will be named later in the spring.

The committee’s honorary chairs are Thomas Kail ’99 and Lin-Manuel Miranda ’02, Hon. ’15, and the prize is named in their honor for their now famous achievement in creating the cultural phenomenon Hamilton: An American Musical. The prize will be awarded to an incoming student who has submitted a creative written work judged to best reflect the originality, artistry and dynamism embodied in Hamilton.

Hamilton Prize Committee

I look forward with great enthusiasm to finding out which incoming Wesleyan student will be chosen by the committee to receive this exceptional honor, which includes a four-year full-tuition scholarship.

The deadline for submissions for the Hamilton Prize and to apply to Wesleyan is January 1, 2017. You can read more about the Hamilton Prize and the committee here.

Quiara Hudes: “Let Us Nourish Each Other”

hudes_quiara_alegriaShapiro Distinguished Professor of Writing and Theater Quiara Alegria Hudes was recently asked by American Theater for some brief post-election reflections on “what theater can do.” She kindly gave me permission to share her brief essay here as a guest blog.

 

Panoramic time

My grandmother’s was a food=love home. The meals were modest, sometimes limited in quantity if the grocery budget was tight, but even the way Abuela placed the tin plate on the table revealed a practiced and virtuosic love. Hers was a humility bursting with enterprise: in times of scarcity there ought always be small bowl of food offer to a neighbor.

The danger of food=love came when the meals went beyond nourishment to something more voracious—consumption for consumption’s sake. Abuela left her farm in Puerto Rico in the 50s, trading a familiar agrarian poverty for an unkind Philadelphia poverty. What a wager she took coming here, what a bold move it was.

By the time of my adolescence, her risky bet started to show returns. While some of her progeny remained mired in poverty, my mom bought a new red Volvo with leather seats. We drove to the local sushi restaurant and ordered sashimi a la carte. By my twenties, friends were charging foie-stuffed kobe burgers to corporate law accounts. Abundance had tipped into vampirism.

Reflecting on this election cycle, I wonder if information=truth is the internet-age version of food=love. It is imperative, of course, that we search for, scrutinize, articulate, and share what information we can gather—it is democratic.

But in the months leading up to November 8, my information=truth gauge got off-kilter. I became a sucker for every bit of click-bait, eschewing information for binge-consumed spin. If there were articles engaging substantively with each candidate’s platform, I didn’t find my way to them. Instead I consumed (miserably, growing more sick with each click) mud-slinging op-eds, grotesque tweets, debate spectacles.

The morning after, I felt disgusted, like an addict who looks in the mirror after the binge. I was the fool complicit in my own duping—I had gone right along with the scam. The scam goes something like this: the more lavish the plate of food, the better the meal. The more media consumed per hour, the vaster one’s knowledge.

On November 9, I turned off the news. Even trusted sites, like the New York Times, had to go dark—because it wasn’t just “fake news” that had duped me, it was “real news,” too. I returned to my dog-eared James Baldwin, flashlight in hand, as the kids slept. I underlined new passages, wrote fresh margin notes atop fading ones. My mind made space for a thing called quiet. My habits returned to what Danielle Allen calls “slow reading.”

Fellow artists, let’s reject the rhetoric and infrastructure of “consumer content.” Let’s renounce the toxic suck of the five-minute news cycle. Ours must be a practice of panoramic time. For, we are a past we did not choose but inherited, and we architect the future with each new page we write.

Let us nourish each other.

 

Thank You for Giving!

Giving Tuesday was a great success here at Wesleyan with over 3,674 gifts received. This triggered the generous $300,000 donation to financial aid from the Frank-Kim family, and all the gifts will go to supporting programs of interest to students across the University.

It was a big day for philanthropy around the world, and I am so grateful that the Wesleyan family responded with such verve and munificence (can’t you tell I’m teaching a class on virtue)!

Giving Tuesday Almost Here! Remember WESU FM!!

After the Black Friday and Cyber Monday advertisements have inundated us with calls to shop, shop, shop, let’s preserve some room in our heads to heed the plea of #GivingTuesday: give, give, give. Wesleyan is again participating in this global philanthropic movement, with the encouragement of  a matching gift from the Frank-Kim Family. When 3,000 members of our Cardinal community give to Wesleyan for any purpose on or before Giving Tuesday, November 29, 2016, the Frank-Kim family will donate $300,000 for financial aidYou can find out how to make your gift here.

And while we’re in a generous mood, let’s remember our wonderful community radio station: WESU FM. I just received a request for donations from the current vice president of WESU, Ben Goldberg:

Thanks to everyone who has responded to our calls to action–we’ve made quite some progress with our current fall pledge drive. We have less than $7k to go, and we need your support to push us through to the end of this campaign. We can’t keep the station running without you, so know that your donation really does make a difference.

 If you haven’t donated yet, now is the time. Community radio and alternative organizing are crucial right now, as they have always been. WESU is a truly special place, providing a platform for marginalized voices to be heard across the world. It is a place for hope, resistance, and change.

Through our incredible host of public affairs programs and music shows, WESU empowers people of color, indigenous populations, women, and queer folks to spread their own stories and messages that are often ignored in the mainstream media. Homegrown shows like Your English is Good as well our Italian programs serve communities that still use English as a second language. Syndicated programming like Pacifica’s Rising Up with Sonali and Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman have been providing powerful coverage on Standing Rock, The Climate Action Summit, police shootings and activism around the world. These are just a few examples of the important work WESU does to serve so many different communities.

 Radio can be an incredibly powerful tool for both DJs and listeners alike, as I’m hoping you all have had the opportunity to experience. If you haven’t yet felt the power of community radio, keep listening–you’ll find it. Community radio matters. Independent media matters. WESU matters. Donate today! www.wesufm.org/pledge

We have much to be thankful for at Wesleyan, and many ways to contribute to organizations we care about. Let’s show that support between now at Tuesday, November 29th!